First it was a MySpace, a site that was fine for a while. Then a google page and wiki space soon followed. I have now settled down, and am quite content I might add, here at blogger. So why is it that all summer long there have been conversations like this (note that I am not simulating one single conversation but a conglomerate of many, many conversations I have had):
Friend/Relative/Acquaintance: "Hey do you have a Facebook?"
Me: "No"
Friend/Relative/Acquaintance: "You should"
Me: "It is just another electronic media that I would have to check. I already have a MySp......"
Friend/Relative/Acquaintance: "Facebook is way better/cooler/hipper than MySpace. I deleted my MySpace like months ago, no one uses MySpace, MySpace is for kids."
Me: ".....ace that I don't use, so why would I get a Facebook?"
Friend/Relative/Acquaintance: "You should still get one."
Me: Thinking...... Hard to argue with logic like that.
It seemed to everyone else that I was being stubborn and trying to be the obstinate one that didn't go along with the crowd. That was true, but now, after being left out for so long, I yearn to be part of the group. But how can I just change my position and keep my street cred? I needed an inspiring example of someone swallowing their pride and changing their opinion on something.
I found such an example in a close friend. Four years ago I was getting married and invited a friend of mine to the wedding. He/she chose not to go because he didn't believe in marriage. To be fair, I am sure he/she believed it existed, just not for him and if he could help it not his close friends. He/she was not able to talk me out of the wedding, and he/she did not grace us with his/her presence there. Now four years later, this friend has attended many more of his/her friends weddings and his/her attitude about marriage has changed. He/she isn't married or engaged, or promised, or promised to be engaged (that I know of) but he/she is less hostile and even open to the concept. Now if a friend can change his/her views on marriage, I should be able to change my opinion of Facebook.
So here it goes, I am posting this and then going on Facebook to create my profile. First person to add me gets......... a hug......from........ me......... someday.
I would also like to use this post as a platform to publicly apologize to Paul for not attending his wedding. I am full of shame.
Showing posts with label Learning. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Learning. Show all posts
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
Thursday, September 24, 2009
Hurt Feelings.
This is how I feel, an autobiographical rap, things that happened to us....If you don't know what happened go read AYC first.
Have you ever had a friend tell you you were wrong?
Has he ever wrote a 576 word blog?
Did another friend laugh when he read the blog?
I got hurt feelings, I got hurt feelings......
This is how I would feel if I was wrong.
Since I am not I don't have hurt feelings.
Let me explain. The definition of positive reinforcement is,
Positive reinforcement is an increase in the future frequency of a behavior due to the addition of a stimulus immediately following a response.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reinforcement
Notice that stimulus is neither + or - (why did I use symbols? I am a math teacher, I can)
An example, but by no means a definition would be...
Positive reinforcement is a procedure whereby a student, contingent upon performing a specific behavior, is immediately rewarded to maintain or increase that behavior.
www.usu.edu/teachall/text/behavior/BEHAVglos.htm (As AYC so elequently quoted)
The desired behavior was you throwing interceptions (Why? I have my reasons). And by my telling you that "you sucked" I was adding a stimuli to increase the behavior of you throwing interceptions.
Me: "Friend, I find that I would probably respond better to positive reinforcement, rather than negative."
Lets assume that that I didn't want you to throw interceptions, even if that was true I was still not giving you negative reinforcement. (Seems like a double negative but it isn't) To be negative reinforcemnt, I would have had to be removing a stimuli,
Negative Reinforcement is an increase in the future frequency of a behavior when the consequence is the removal of an aversive stimulus. http://allpsych.com/psychology101/reinforcement.html
What I would have been giving you was punishment.
Punishment refers to adding something aversive in order to decrease a behavior.http://allpsych.com/psychology101/reinforcement.html.
The fourth kind of Reinforcement would be,
Extinction, when you remove something in order to decrease a behavior, this is called extinction. You are taking something away so that a response is decreased. http://allpsych.com/psychology101/reinforcement.html.
I don't know about you but I feel like we all learned something today, I know I did. And to follow suit I will end on a positive note, thanks to Shawna for letting us crash her apartment for the better part of a week and to Caleb for putting it all together and making sure that I would be a part of the fun.
Have you ever had a friend tell you you were wrong?
Has he ever wrote a 576 word blog?
Did another friend laugh when he read the blog?
I got hurt feelings, I got hurt feelings......
This is how I would feel if I was wrong.
Since I am not I don't have hurt feelings.
Let me explain. The definition of positive reinforcement is,
Positive reinforcement is an increase in the future frequency of a behavior due to the addition of a stimulus immediately following a response.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reinforcement
Notice that stimulus is neither + or - (why did I use symbols? I am a math teacher, I can)
An example, but by no means a definition would be...
Positive reinforcement is a procedure whereby a student, contingent upon performing a specific behavior, is immediately rewarded to maintain or increase that behavior.
www.usu.edu/teachall/text/behavior/BEHAVglos.htm (As AYC so elequently quoted)
The desired behavior was you throwing interceptions (Why? I have my reasons). And by my telling you that "you sucked" I was adding a stimuli to increase the behavior of you throwing interceptions.
Me: "Friend, I find that I would probably respond better to positive reinforcement, rather than negative."
Lets assume that that I didn't want you to throw interceptions, even if that was true I was still not giving you negative reinforcement. (Seems like a double negative but it isn't) To be negative reinforcemnt, I would have had to be removing a stimuli,
Negative Reinforcement is an increase in the future frequency of a behavior when the consequence is the removal of an aversive stimulus. http://allpsych.com/psychology101/reinforcement.html
What I would have been giving you was punishment.
Punishment refers to adding something aversive in order to decrease a behavior.http://allpsych.com/psychology101/reinforcement.html.
The fourth kind of Reinforcement would be,
Extinction, when you remove something in order to decrease a behavior, this is called extinction. You are taking something away so that a response is decreased. http://allpsych.com/psychology101/reinforcement.html.
I don't know about you but I feel like we all learned something today, I know I did. And to follow suit I will end on a positive note, thanks to Shawna for letting us crash her apartment for the better part of a week and to Caleb for putting it all together and making sure that I would be a part of the fun.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)